Bug Advocacy Part II

Last Tuesday, I gave my Experience Report on Bug Advocacy at the latest WeTest Auckland Meetup. It was a bit daunting - not that the audience had menacing expressions on their faces or anything, but I tend to do a little freak out before I speak in front of people. Something that I need to work on. Here is the link to my Prezi.

Below is a reflection on the Bug Advocacy Meetup we had last Tuesday.

A bit of background information about my experience: I’ve never been on an Agile project. Neither have I been brought into a project early in the SDLC. By the time I’ve come on to projects, the software has already been built. This meant that some people questioned why I don’t just talk to the developer and get the bug fixed? Or why don’t I just write it on a post-it note and stick it up on their computer? While I agree that these are great ideas, I’ve been on projects where things have to be tracked in a Testing tool. I learned a lot from the discussions that followed my experience report. Namely, how people deal with bugs when they are on ’less traditional’ projects. I also found it interesting to see that people seem to be just as passionate about functional bugs as they are about usability bugs; arguing that the usability bugs make the software _‘unprofessional’. _After my Experience Report, I prepared an activity which involved finding bugs in two different driving school websites.

These usability issues included:

I then played Devil’s Advocate and argued back why one shouldn’t have to fix the above issues. That really riled them up.

They explained to me why these bugs should be fixed and how some of them would be a quick fix. So given the impact of the issue, and how relatively easy it would be to fix - some of these bugs really weren’t worth arguing about.

Here are a few things that people agreed on that makes a good bug report:

Here are a few things that people agreed helps you advocate for bugs:

Here’s a link to Bug Advocacy Part I